According to the LA Times, Many mortgage lenders are “overwhelmed and disorganized but they continue to foreclose on borrowers who are actually in the process of finalizing a home loan modification that would ensure more affordable monthly payments. At a time when the housing market is flooded with foreclosed homes, this doesn’t help anyone. The federal government rolled their attempt to stem the foreclosure crisis with the Home Affordable Modification Program that was created to stop lenders from foreclosing while a modification is pending, but other initiatives don’t.  

California Senators Mark Leno and Darrell Steinberg are proposing to extend the same protection to all Californians seeking loan modifications. The California loan modification bill (SB 1275) would stop a home loan lender or mortgage service company from initiating the foreclosure process until after a mortgage loan modification application was denied. It’s a modest change that wouldn’t require mortgage lenders to change the terms of any loan modification program. Nor would it require lenders to do more to reach borrowers before foreclosing than state law already requires or to slow down foreclosures on borrowers who are beyond help.  The law would require mortgage lenders to notify borrowers who get behind on their home loan payments about the foreclosure process and the availability of home refinancing or loan modification options, if any. And if borrowers applied unsuccessfully for a loan workout, the mortgage company would have to send them a letter explaining why they were denied and how they can appeal the decision before filing a notice that the mortgage was in default.  The purpose of the bill was not just another attempt to help homeowners avoid making their mortgage payments; but it was created to help protect lenders from themselves.  A recent report revealed that Housing counselors say the No. 1 problem is poor communication between mortgage companies and distressed borrowers.

DataQuick reported that home foreclosures totaled 1,515 in December, up 41.9% from November and up 20.9% from a year earlier. It was the biggest stack of foreclosures since June’s 1,630.  Meanwhile, notices of default, the first legal action on the road to foreclosure, dipped 11.5 % from November’s 2,122 to December’s 1,878, the smallest figure since November 2008. It was down 38.5 % year over year.  To real estate agents hungry for inventory of low-cost foreclosures to sell to bargain hunters, the upsurge in foreclosures promises to refill empty lists of homes for sale, although agents have complained in recent months that banks aren’t moving quickly to list those properties as a California short sales possibly increasing their bottom line..

On the default side, the continuing decline reflects the pressure being placed on lenders to work with troubled owners by modifying loans to make them more affordable, at least on a short-term basis, or allow properties to be sold as short sales — sold for less than the outstanding mortgage balance.  “Clearly, many lenders and (loan) servicers have concluded that the traditional foreclosure process isn’t necessarily the best way to process market distress,” DataQuick President John Walsh said.

DataQuick analyst Andrew LePage said San Diego had the state’s highest large-county foreclosure spike in December.  “It’s a mystery,” he said of the increase. Home foreclosures were up only 19 % in the six-county Southern California region.  Many analysts warned against extrapolating from the latest data to assume that widespread distress on the wane. “Because the economy is no better and values have not come back significantly, there’s pressure on banks to postpone notices of default in an effort to seek alternatives,” said Mark Goldman, an adjunct professor of real estate at San Diego State University. He said San Diego might be nearing a “rough landing” and some price increases in certain areas. But the high-end part of the market still appears weak.

The number of homes entering the first stage of foreclosure, or receiving notices of default, declined 24.3% during the fourth quarter from the prior three months, according to county data collected by DataQuick, a San Diego research firm. The decline in the default number is significant because any new wave of foreclosures will first be detected by that measure, according to the firm.  Meanwhile, the number of homes taken back by lenders through trustee sales ticked up 2.1% in the fourth quarter over the third. The trustee sale is the final stage of California’s foreclosure process.  “Clearly, many mortgage lenders and servicers have concluded that the traditional foreclosure process isn’t necessarily the best way to process market distress,” MDA DataQuick President John Walsh said. He said banks have been negotiating with distressed borrowers to keep them in their homes and increasingly turning to “short sales” in which the banks accept an offer that is less than the value of the outstanding mortgage; banks end up taking a loss on such deals.  At the same time, big banks are feeling intense pressure in Washington to work with troubled borrowers through the Obama administration’s Making Home Affordable program. Much of that relief has been temporary.

Through December, banks had lowered mortgage payments for 172,288 California borrowers, but only 7.8% of those modifications were permanent, according to government data.  Many experts consider that record a failure and fear that if the government doesn’t improve its performance those mortgage loans eventually will go into foreclosure and put pressure anew on the state’s housing market. 

While the number of California mortgage delinquencies declined to 8.71% at the end of the fourth quarter from 8.87% at the end of the third, according to data from Equifax and Moody’s Economy.com, the percentage loans that were 120 days or more past due increased to 4.7% from 4.51%.  Those figures indicate that the Obama administration’s efforts to help troubled homeowners have allowed some borrowers to stay out of default but kept many in a kind of late stage of delinquency limbo, said Celia Chen, senior director of Moody’s Economy.com. If the majority of borrowers who have received temporary loan modifications under Obama’s program are unable to get permanent changes to their bad credit mortgages, another wave of foreclosures could follow, she said.  “Given what we see in terms of the number of distressed properties that are in the pipeline, we do expect that home foreclosures will mount as borrowers are not able to make it from a trial modification to a permanent modification,” Chen said. “This will cause home prices to start falling again.” A total of 84,568 notices of default were recorded at county recorders offices during the fourth quarter, an increase of 12.4% from the fourth quarter of 2008. Trustees deeds recorded, or the actual loss of a home to foreclosure, totaled 51,060 during the fourth quarter, up 10.6% from 46,183 for fourth-quarter 2008.  An all-time high for notices of default was reached in the first quarter of 2009 at 135,431.

The governor signed AB 260 which will take effect January 1, 2010 and will tighten restrictions on mortgage brokers so they will be unable to steer borrowers towards riskier, higher-interest loans when they qualify for safer, more affordable home mortgages. 

The mortgage relief law will also prohibit negative-amortization home loans, which offer monthly payments that do not include any principal or even all of the monthly accrued interest, which can cause the amount of a home loan to increase over time.

The law also limits prepayment penalties to no more than 2% of the home loan balance and gives state regulators the power to enforce federal lending laws.  The governor vetoed similar legislation last year at the urging of some groups in the mortgage and real estate industries. The California Association of Mortgage Brokers, the California Mortgage Association and the California Association of Realtors opposed this year’s version of the bill to no prevail.

Sam Khater, senior economist, First American CoreLogic. “To say there is a second wave implies the existing wave has receded,” Khater told me. “I don’t see that the wave has receded.”  Khater shared his historical data of 90-day delinquency rates for Orange County, as well as the foreclosure-in-process rates and rates of REOs, or foreclosures on banks’ books. The 90-day rate includes all outstanding 1st mortgages at least three months late but not yet foreclosed. The foreclosure rate is just 1st mortgages with a notice of default or trustee’s sale filing.

If you look at the 90-day rate it has been heading straight up it has not scaled back. Khater also said the California foreclosure rate and REO rates have been impacted by government tinkering in the market. He said federal and state efforts have mostly delayed foreclosures, preventing few.

In Khater’s view it shows “one giant wave.”  Local State and Federal loan modification programs have helped thousands of borrowers keep their homes, but in some cases the mortgage relief was simply delaying the inevitable loan default that will push the homeowners out with a legal foreclosure.

Mathew Padilla elaborated more the 2nd-wave of foreclosures looming for so-Cal neighborhoods. He said it’s based on the idea that there has been a lull in home “foreclosures and the big second and maybe third or fourth waves will come as low introductory payments end on various types of adjustable-rate loans.” Credit Suisse released reports with graphs highlighting significant of resets and interest rate recasts in 2010, 2011 and 2012. 

Industry insiders have already discussed that defaults remain high for negative amortization option ARMs.  The report reminds us that we need not wait for the adjustable rate loans to adjust, because many of them are already defaulting.  If you are a homeowner seeking a loan workout make sure that you contract with a reputable law firm or loan modification company.  Ask about their refund policy, in case the lender rejects your request for a loan modification.

The U.S. Federal Trade Commission and authorities in 20 states have sued dozens of individuals and loan modification companies as part of what they said on Wednesday was a crackdown on loan modification scams that have accelerated the home foreclosure crisis.  The 189 lawsuits and other court actions target the “con artists” who offer to help homeowners facing foreclosure, only to take up-front fees and perform little or no service.  “It’s an operation full of hollow promises designed to fatten the pockets of criminals and con artists,” FTC Chairman Jon Leibowitz said in announcing the move at a press conference in Los Angeles.  “These con artists see the high foreclosure rates as an opportunity to prey on people in distress,” Leibowitz said. “They promise to provide mortgage relief for troubled homeowners but after they take their money they throw them an anchor instead of a lifeline.”

United States mortgage fraud reports jumped 36% last year as desperate homeowners and industry professionals tried to maintain their standard of living from the boom years, the U.S. Federal Bureau of Investigation said last week, calling fraud rampant and growing.  California Attorney General Jerry Brown said his office had sued 21 individuals and 14 companies accused of scamming homeowners, saying that many of the operations were based in Orange County, south of Los Angeles. Also Brown said that bogus loan modification scams had proliferated widely following the subprime meltdown and housing crash, to the point where authorities with limited resources were unable to effectively pursue all of them.  “We’re going to do everything we can to stop it, realizing that there are more of these rats that come out of their holes than we can stomp on,” Brown said. “This is one of the more egregious wrongs we see committed in society and we are going to fight it.” 

U.S. mortgage fraud reports jumped 36% last year as desperate homeowners and industry professionals tried to maintain their standard of living from the boom years, the U.S. Federal Bureau of Investigation said last week, calling fraud rampant and growing.  Leibowitz said that many who offer loan modification schemes deceive homeowners by posing as quasi-governmental agencies or implying that they are working with federal agencies and cautioned consumers to be aware of the scams.

According to Real Estate News Publication, Housing Crisis Under Fire, California loan modification scams lead the nation in loss mitigation fraud.  California Attorney General Jerry Brown said his office had sued 21 individuals and 14 companies accused of scamming homeowners, saying that many of the operations were based in Orange County, south of Los Angeles. Also Brown said that bogus loan modification scams had proliferated widely following the subprime meltdown and housing crash, to the point where authorities with limited resources were unable to effectively pursue all of them.  “We’re going to do everything we can to stop it, realizing that there are more of these rats that come out of their holes than we can stomp on,” Brown said. “This is one of the more egregious wrongs we see committed in society and we are going to fight it.” 

www.youtube.com/watch?v=TX_-nTtNXfU

California Foreclosure Moratorium Guidelines:

ü  The moratorium applies to first mortgages made from 2003 through 2007.

ü  The home loan must be for your principal residence.

ü  The homeowner must have received a notice of default.

ü  The home loan servicer does not have a California loan modification program in place.

ü  Because many homeowners are upside down on their home loans

There is a concern that the 90-day negotiating period will only postpone the inevitable because so far the banks are not reducing the principal.  Read the complete Article from the Loan Modification Outlet.> Loan Modification Plans and California Foreclosure Moratorium

Sales of existing single-family homes were down 30% last year from the 2005 level, while new-home sales showed a record-breaking plunge of more than 60% from 2005 to 2008, according to the Harvard report.

Many Wall Street analysts covering the home-builder sector remain skeptical of talk of a sustained recovery. “Overall, the California builders and construction companies we met with echoed what we have been hearing throughout the U.S.: that there was clear momentum in sales in the spring, but concerns still remain around the sustainability of the improvement we have seen,” said Barclays Capital analyst Megan McGrath in a note recapping a recent industry conference.   “The availability of credit, to both builders themselves and to home buyers, continues to be challenging,” McGrath wrote. “While it appears that banks and mortgage lenders are willing to do some construction-only loans to builders, land-related financing appears to be relatively non-existent.”

According to the Mortgage Bankers Association, at least 3.2 million homeowners entered foreclosure in 2007 and 2008, and an additional 600,000 entered foreclosure in the first quarter of 2009.   Mortgage servicing companies and lenders continue to report a flux of loan modification applications, so we know the demand for foreclosure prevention measures still exists.  Despite these dismal foreclosure figures, the Harvard report did see some long-term positives for the U.S. residential market. In particular, it cited demographic trends such as expected demand from immigrants and so-called echo boomers, or the children of baby boomers. 

San Bernardino County had about 4,000 notices of default and the seventh-highest rate of foreclosure sales in April.  The main state foreclosure law to emerge last year was SB 1137. It requires lenders and loan servicers to talk with borrowers before starting foreclosure proceedings. The goal is to get more mortgage loan modifications.  This year, lawmakers introduced more than 30 foreclosure- and mortgage-related bills. Nearly all of the authors are members of the Legislature’s Democratic majority.  About two-dozen measures are still pending, with most facing a Friday deadline to clear the Legislature’s appropriations panels.

Some of the bills would put the state in compliance with the federal Secure and Fair Enforcement of Mortgage Licensing Act approved in July 2008.  The law requires mortgage loan originators to be licensed and complete 20 hours of pre-licensing legislation, along with other requirements.